Latest version of 'local plan' is still damaging for Sanderstead 14/07/2016 08:23:00......Posted by Tim Pollard
The council’s ‘Local Plan’ – a document containing their plans for building in the borough – has been released for approval after consulting with the public.
The Council received over 7,000 objections to previous draft of the Local Plan last year when local Conservative Councillors, Residents’ Associations and residents came together in unprecedented fashion to object to the Labour-controlled Council’s ideas.
As a result the council has backtracked in a number of key areas.
What was proposed in the original plans:
a gypsy and traveller site in Conduit Lane, in the green belt, next to the award winning Coombe Wood Gardens. U-TURN AFTER PRESSURE
a gypsy and traveller site at Coombe Farm, in the green belt, next to Lloyd Park. U-TURN AFTER PRESSURE
a gypsy and traveller site at Pear Tree Farm, in the green belt. U-TURN AFTER PRESSURE
the return to policies that allow building on back gardens and any green space, with developers pressurising homeowners through garden grabbing.GARDENS WILL HAVE GREATER PROTECTION AFTER PRESSURE
intensification of development around shopping parades, such as Limpsfield Road, South Croydon, Forestdale and Shirley. MAJORITY OF SUBURBAN STREETS WITHDRAWN AFTER PRESSURE
Whilst Labour have u-turned on many issues there are still a number of areas of the local plan that will change the nature of our borough forever:
the introduction of a gypsy and traveller site at the Purley Highways Depot, behind the already overcrowded recycling centre.
the loss of greenbelt status for areas such as (Site of Special Scientific Interest) Croham Hurst Woods, Sanderstead Plantation and Purley Downs.
the introduction of a number of schools into the green belt.
the downgrading of the much loved Metropolitan Open Land around Shirley Oaks Village, though the plans for 100s of new homes have been dropped.
the loss of Local Area of Special Character protection for over twenty roads including West Hill, Stanhope Road, Preston Road and Cheston Avenue.
In Sanderstead the three main issues are the downgrading from Green Belt of Sanderstead Plantation and Purley Downs Golf Club and the proposed intensification of the area between Limpsfield Road and Onslow Gardens - which means blocks of flats could replace the current low rise developments of houses and bungalows. We objected to this last time and as a result the proposed area has been made smaller, but it is still too large, taking in Onslow Gardens (end by All Saints’), Blenheim Gardens and Cranleigh Gardens.
Just like last time it is imperative that as many residents as possible respond to the latest consultation which will commence on 5th September 2016 for a six week period.
Whilst Labour bowing to public and political pressure is welcome, there are still major areas of concern for Croydon, namely the introduction of a new gypsy and traveller site in Purley; the downgrading of much loved greenbelt and metropolitan open land and the loss of protected special character status for many roads, with the sneaky move from Local Areas of Special Character to Local Heritage Areas.
Despite bowing to public pressure, Labour still have plans to downgrade our precious greenbelt and remove the special status of many areas in Croydon. This is our last chance to fight these damaging proposals. Now more than ever residents need to let this Council know that their plans are simply not good enough for our town.
How to comment on the plans:
The Local Plan documents, the accompanying Sustainability Appraisals and the Representation Form to respond to the Consultation may be viewed once the consultation starts:
At the borough’s libraries (during normal opening hours)
At Bernard Weatherill House (Access Croydon), Mint Walk, Croydon, 9:00am-4:00pm (Monday to Friday)
20mph Zones in South of the Borough 16/01/2018 19:20:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
As residents will be well aware signs are appearing in the south of the borough for the introduction of the 20mph zone. We realise that this may well be confusing for some residents with Sanderstead Road and a number of others remaining at 30mph whilst others such as Purley Downs Road are 20mph.
Residents may also find it particularly confusing when faced with a choice. What do you mean you might say? Well in some roads, Farmfields for instance, just by Sanderstead library the signs on the entry to the road show 30 on one side and 20 on the other.
I have asked officers if they can explain the signage which residents have brought to my attention saying they are quite confused.
Enquiry into Purley Tower 16/01/2018 14:29:00.......Posted by Tim Pollard
I today attended the morning session of the Purley Baptists' Church public enquiry. Below is the notes I based my comments to the inspector on - it's not verbatim, but it's pretty close to what I said.
I am not opposed to a mixed use scheme on this site per se. The Councillors’ manifestos in local elections 2002-14 all included a pledge to encourage appropriate development on this site. The issue for me is the scale and appropriateness of the application.
Many towns have faced a similar moment of decision, where a single application determines the future direction of an entire built environment. Croydon town centre had its moment in the early fifties – when it chose to become an edge city rather than a market town. This is Purley’s moment.
The future with this development seems certain to be quite different from the future without it. In most planning applications a building is just a building. In this case it is highly likely that it will determine the whole future of Purley.
Local MP Chris Philp has set out his view on how this development is in conflict with policy at national, regional and local level. That case has been extensively tested in the enquiry so I won’t repeat those arguments.
Just a few points from Chris’ evidence to highlight. From CLP2 (2017) DM16 tall buildings should “Respect and enhance the local character”. Elsewhere “The design should be of exceptional quality and demonstrate that a sensitive approach has been taken in the articulation and composition of the building form which is proportionate to its scale”.
I don’t believe this scheme in any way respects of enhances local character and my personal opinion of the design as set out so far is bog-standard at best. It is completely different to any other building in Purley or any building in the borough south of the town centre. It would not be out of character in Croydon centre.
As articulated by Chris Philp last week, there are other policies in CLP1 SP4 which it can be strongly argued this proposal contradicts: positive contribution to the skyline and high quality public realm appropriate to the scale & significance of the building.
Steve O'Connell spoke about the tunnel effect which would be created with the road running between the densely built southern site and the island site itself. I fully agree with him. The point has also been made that a ‘landmark building’ does not have to be tall – indeed the one marking the edge of the town centre which you see as you enter the gyratory under the railway arches is only 6 storey – it is the design which makes it a landmark, not the scale.
And the point has been made that Purley is accessible by public transport and has a high PTAL rating. That’s true if you are going north-south, but not east-west.
The strong local opinion against a development of this scale has been previously set before the Inspector. These residents are not nimby’s - they are local people who are concerned that this proposal will redefine Purley town centre for a generation and is taking the town in a direction which they, as local residents, have not signed up for.
Given the landmark nature of this decision I would urge that policy be interpreted in the light of the directional change it would mark for the town and great weight be given to those policies which can be seen as suggesting that this is not the right development for this site.
I would conclude by stressing that I want to see this site redeveloped. I want to see the church develop its community offer and I want to see the site contrivute to the housing needs of London. I just don’t want to see this happen at any price to the town. A smaller, less dense development which makes appropriate arrangements for parking in line with how people actually behave would be very welcome.
I therefore urge you to reject this application to enable a better one, which can have local buy in, to come forward.
Mitchley View road safety 18/12/2017 14:54:00.......Posted by Tim Pollard
Last week I received a petition many residents of Mitchely View, Briar Grove and the nearby area of Mitchely Hill have signed to request that the council agrees to extend the double yellow lines on Mitchley Hill to either side of the Mitchley View junction, with the aim of improving road safety as residents leave Mitchley View.
I have written to the council’s democratic services manager to ask that this be put on the agenda for the next full council meeting on 29 January 2018. I will present the petition to the relevant cabinet member and he will respond to the request either at that meeting or the next one.
A couple of concerned residents contacted me in the summer about this and I wrote to the council’s road safety officer asking that the junction be prioritised for consultation. The response that I got then was not encouraging, reproduced in full below:
The officer wrote……
I did spend some time on site looking at the sightlines and also observing driver behaviour at the junction and of course driving out of the junction myself. I’ve attached a series of photographs showing the line of sight for drivers emerging from the junction.
In short the existing double yellow lines and the fact that the junction is on the outside of a bend helps provide good sightlines and there is no justification in extending these at the present time. Care is always needed when joining a main road but I don’t consider this junction any different to many junctions across the Borough and if anything probably easier to negotiate than some.
Although this response was not favourable, and this will therefore colour the view of the cabinet member making a response to the petition, I do agree with residents (as opposed to the officer) on this and am happy to keep pressing the council to think again. A letter similar to this blog post will be hand-delivered to the residents affected in the next few days.
Xmas Lights - Sanderstead and Hamsey Green 05/12/2017 17:12:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
On Saturday I attended the official switch on for the Xmas lights outside Priscillas Cafe. The Sanderstead councillors purchased additional lights for the trees and lamp posts from their councillor budget for Sanderstead and Hamsey Green.
It was a joyous occasion officiated by Jeremy Groombridge from All Saints Church and of course Santa who arrived courtesy of the Rotary Club. The lights will remain on during the day throughout the festive season and have low voltage bulbs.
It has made a huge difference to the area and we have received many compliments and thanks for all the work involved in making Sanderstead more festive!
Garden grabbing encouraged in Mayor Khan's London Plan 29/11/2017 13:38:00.......Posted by Tim Pollard
The key issues to note for Croydon are as follows.
As suspected, protection for back gardens has been removed. In addition, the Plan actually appears to be encouraging garden grabbing with a presumption in favour of 'infill development within the curtilage of a house'.
The housing density matrix has been completely removed. This means there are no limits or guidelines to the appropriate density of developments in particular areas.
Also as expected, there has been a drastic squeeze on parking standards. All developments with PTAL of 5-6 (i.e. areas with good public transport) are expected to be car free without exception. There is also a squeeze on office and retail parking.
Whilst internal housing space standards remain the same, it now says they should not be exceeded. The previous London Plan encouraged the space standards to be exceeded. So they are effectively now a maximum, rather than a minimum.
There are no targets for family homes, despite previous commitments. Boris's housing strategy had a target for 36% of affordable homes to be family sized. There was no target in Khan's housing strategy and we were told to expect this in the London Plan instead - however, it is not there. It also suggests that two bed units can be considered suitable for family housing.
As previously announced, the new London housing target is 64,935 homes a year across London. Croydon’s share is just under 3,000 homes per year, the fifth highest in London and the largest of any of the boroughs without large brownfield (former industrial or housing) sites. The borough breakdown show that Croydon’s target is double Bromley’s and three times Sutton’s.
Within this, there is also a new specific target for development on small sites of 24,573 homes per year. Again Croydon’s target is 50% more than Bromley’s and double Sutton’s.
There is a 'strategic target' for 50% affordable housing across London.
Cumulatively, these policies will encourage (particularly in outer London suburbs) a huge increase in the demolition of existing family housing and its replacement with blocks of flats with little to no parking provision.
Onslow Gardens closure: Tardis required 27/11/2017 13:05:00.......Posted by Tim Pollard
The council placed signs at the weekend announcing the closure of Onslow Gardens from 30th Nov to the 4th Nov. We think they meant until 4th Dec! So unless you have a time machine handy, don't worry about the closures in the past....
As is frustratingly common they put the signs up before telling the councillors, so we have been unable to shed any light on what is happening until now.
It seems that the closure is necessitated by the back garden development at no 24, about which I bloogged several times duing the planning process. The two infill houses need ot be connected to the mains sewerage and that is the cause of the closure.
The actual closure takes place on the following days 30/11, 1/12 and 4/12, according to officers, which suggests it will reopen over the weekend.
Displaced traffic will be diverted via Blenheim Gardens and Cranleigh Gardens. Access will be maintained for residents up to works site and via diversion.
South East Cancer Help Centre - AGM & Member's Meeting 23/11/2017 21:35:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
I was delighted to Chair the Annual General Meeting of the South East Cancer Help Centre along with the Members' Meeting. It has been another successful year with not only an increase in membership but funding as well. Paint Purley Purple was a great success with Chris Philp MP cutting the ribbon to start the week-long fundraising and awareness campaign.
Our guest speaker was Gary Das, who retired in 2016 from CUH. Gary was a consultant urological surgeon in Croydon and also a pelvic cancer surgeon at St George's Hospital in London. Gary gave a fascinating talk on his transition to becoming a surgeon at CUH and his book "Tender is the Scalpel's Edge".
The centre goes from strength to strength and is always looking for new volunteers. If you feel you could spare a few hours do get in touch with Linda Kenison on 020 8668 0974. The centre offers a wide range of activities and therapies and counselling can be booked through Linda.
Dementia Friends 23/11/2017 16:22:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
I was pleased to see so many Conservative councillors and selected candidates take part in the Dementia Awareness session given by Rachel Carse, the new officer appointed to take forward work on Dementia and Social Incusion. I have been working with the Dementia Alliance group for almost a year helping to raise awareness about people with Dementia. We all have lapses in memory and sometimes get a little confused but Rachel helped us all understand how we can help identify residents/family or indeed friends who are showing signs of the onset of dementia and explained how we can manage some of the challenges presented by people with Dementia. We have all signed up to undertake a small challenge and support Croydon becoming a Dementia Friendly Borough.
Anna D'Agostino from the Croydon BME Forum also visited the Sanderstead Residents' Association to talk about how to keep your memory strong and stay mentally active. The SRA will include an article in the spring magazine.
As community leaders it is important that we are able to support all our community, young and old and fully understand some of the more complex issues impacting our residents. I was pleased to see that the Borough Commander of Croydon Fire Brigade and Croydon's Metropolitan Police are also happy to take forward this agenda.
If you want to know more about the Dementia Alliance Group or would like to talk to me about the work I progressing do get in touch.
Friends of Purley Beeches AGM 23/11/2017 16:15:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
I attended the AGM of the Friends of Purley Beeches. Many of the members are shocked and horrified that 31 of the borough's parks and green spaces are without local protection. The Friends have worked hard in the beeches planting new trees and bulbs and cutting back much of the overgrowth from the natural pathways. It is a very beautiful spot and has some exceptionally rare and beautiful trees. Groups like this are so important in preserving our green spaces for all to enjoy. The group was formed after a number of trees were felled without informing local residents. Many trees have been planted by the Friends and I am pleased to announce that the Sanderstead councillors will be making a donation from their community budget towards some bulbs to be planted alongside some of the pathways. Do take a stroll through the woodland or maybe enjoy a game of tennis - its a real gem.
Trees Outside Priscillas and The Gruffy -- Xmas Lights 03/11/2017 15:58:00.......Posted by Yvette Hopley
Residents will be delighted to hear that work is underway to put up the new Xmas lights purchased with the councillors community budget. The lights will encircle the trees outside Sanderstead Recreation Park and at the Gruffy. In order for the lights to be installed some minor works needs to be undertaken to remove some of the low hanging twigs and branches from the trees. There will also be some new lights around the lampposts near the roundabout. This builds on the lights already provided by the Sanderstead Residents' Association which will also be put up at the same time. I am sure it will all look quite magical and we are looking forward to the official switch on and Xmas Fayre which will take place on Saturday, 2 December, in the Recreation Ground.
Please do contact us with any issues or concerns you may have. We answer all our constituents' correspondence and value your comments. If you want your concern addressed by your local team, please follow the link above.