Objection to local plan
11/10/2017 07:20:00......Posted by Tim Pollard
Yesterday I submitted my objection to the areas of the local plan we are allowed to comment on at this stage in the procedings - we can only comment on aspects that the inspector has changed since the council's final draft.
You can read my entire objection, including comments on elsewhere in the borough here.
However, my comments specifically on Sanderstead ward are pasted below.
MMD86 – I strongly object to the deletion of the Local Green Space designation across the borough and with particular reference to several vital green spaces in Sanderstead: Sanderstead Plantation, The Gruffy, the pond at the top of Sanderstead Hill and Purley Beeches. Should regional protections be changed by a future London Mayor, these spaces would have no protection and would be available for development. This is not in the interests of my residents, who greatly treasure these spaces, all of which have active Friends’ Groups as a testimony to their local importance. There is more detail on my objections to the deletion in principle in the general section below.
MMD38 – Focussed Intensification Zones should be removed in their entirety from the plan, despite the modifications proposed by the Council. I am, however, pleased that the Inspector has deleted the entirety of the proposed Sanderstead (Onslow Gardens) zone. This was in contradiction with other policies (as per my previous two objections at the preceding stages) and its removal is warmly welcomed.
Technically, as the inspector did not substantively change the proposed designation of the area behind Purley Oaks Recycling Centre as a Gypsy and Traveller site, we are not supposed to comment on it. However, given its local importance I did object again in the full letter (link above).